Johns Hopkins Health Alert
The Gleason Behind the Gleason Score
If you have had prostate cancer, you probably know that the Gleason score is the most important factor in predicting your current state of prostate cancer and its probable outcome. The score is based on tumor grade -- an indication of the tumor's aggressiveness. Tumor grade reflects how far the cancer cells deviate from normal, healthy cells, which are highly organized, with well-defined structures.
Cancer cells display various degrees of disorganization and distortion and could be likened to a Jackson Pollock painting. Cancers whose cells appear closest to normal are considered grade 1 and generally are the least aggressive; those with highly irregular, disorganized features are classified as grade 5 and generally are the most aggressive.
The Gleason score is derived by determining the two most prevalent organizational patterns in the tumor, assigning each a grade, and then adding the two numbers together. For example, if the most common pattern is grade 3 and the next most common pattern is grade 4, the Gleason score would be 3 + 4 = 7. Most pathologists do not recommend assigning Gleason scores below 5 based on needle biopsies because when the prostate is removed and the entire gland is evaluated, lower Gleason scores are almost always upgraded.
Most urologists would classify Gleason scores of 5 and 6 as low-grade tumors, a Gleason score of 7 as intermediate, and Gleason scores of 8, 9, and 10 as high grade, with the least favorable outlook.
The Gleason score was originally devised by Donald F. Gleason, M.D., a pathologist who created the unique and now ubiquitous scoring system in the 1960s based on his observations of prostate tissue taken from biopsy samples of more than 300 patients. The prostate tissue, when riddled with microscopic tumors, had a certain pattern when viewed under a microscope, and Dr. Gleason took note of that, assigning numbers to the various architectural patterns. He finally arrived at five representative pictures that were characteristic of all the patients. When reviewing background data on the patients, a strong correlation was found between their "Gleason score" and the patients' death rates.
By the late 1980s, Dr. Gleason’s system was used in all medical publications on prostate cancer, and is still in use today throughout the world. Your PSA test result, along with your Gleason score, predicts the likely outcome of prostate cancer and it's the gold standard test that will be used to diagnose more than 186,000 men this year with the disease.
Posted in Prostate Disorders on September 3, 2009
Reviewed January 2011
Medical Disclaimer: This information is not intended to substitute for the advice of a physician. Click here for additional information: Johns Hopkins Health Alerts Disclaimer
Notify Me
Would you like us to inform you when we post new Prostate Disorders Health Alerts?
Comments
Health Alerts registered users may post comments and share experiences here at their own discretion. We regret that questions on individual health concerns to the Johns Hopkins editors cannot be answered in this space.
The views expressed here do not constitute medical advice, and do not represent the position of Johns Hopkins Medicine or Remedy Health Media, LLC, which has no responsibility for any comments posted on this site.
Why are we even discussing the PSA any more? Over half of the "positive" results (indicating cancer) are false. And 50% of those whose PSA results are good ones DO HAVE PROSATE CANCER. Even the American Cancer Society has back off recommending this test!
And Gleason/Smeeshon. We are still only treating the symptoms, not the disease. And the needle biopsy? - Sure, lets run a needle through our rectum, and transfer fecal matter into the prostate. That should help! And don't worry about the blood in your urine, stool, or semen. That will go away in a couple of weeks! Sounds like a great diagnostic tool!
Eat right, reduce your fat intake, eliminate sugar from your diet, exercise regularly, don't smoke, drnk very little alcohol, take as many supplemewnts as you can get your hands on, and attempt to overcome 40 or 50 years of bad nutritional intake. That will help to postively deal with the cause of the disease. Letting doctors burn away or cut away your insides won't (excuse the pun) cut it!
Posted by: lmgtexas | September 8, 2009 3:56 PM
Post a Comment
Already a subscriber?
Login
New to Johns Hopkins Health Alerts?
Your article states that "Your PSA test result, along with your Gleason score, predicts the likely outcome of prostate cancer". However, the article also notes that "Most pathologists do not recommend assigning Gleason scores below 5 based on needle biopsies". What then is the value of the needle biopsie? Is it irrelevant? What is the best indication for performing prostatectomy?
Posted by: pinebaron | September 5, 2009 9:55 AM