Johns Hopkins Health Alert
Diagnosing Diabetes with the HbA1c Blood Test
Type 2 diabetes usually develops gradually over many years and the initial symptoms may be almost unnoticeable. In fact, many people find out that they have type 2 diabetes when a routine laboratory test shows high blood glucose levels. Increasingly endocrinologists are using the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test -- which is now used to monitor glucose control in existing patients -- to diagnose diabetes.
If you have any of the common symptoms that suggest the presence of diabetes, your doctor can order a blood glucose test to confirm or rule out the diagnosis. Three blood tests commonly used to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes:
- casual plasma (blood) glucose
- fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
- oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
About six million people with diabetes in the United States don't know they have diabetes, and up to one quarter of U.S. people with diabetes have evidence of serious complications by the time they are diagnosed. That's why a panel of experts -- including Dr. Christopher D. Saudek, the author of The Johns Hopkins Diabetes White Paper -- convened to consider whether the HbA1c test would be a more effective tool for screening for and diagnosing diabetes. The HbA1c test measures the amount of glucose attached to hemoglobin. The test is routinely used to assess blood glucose control over the previous two to three months.
The current tests used for the diagnosis of diabetes -- FPG and OGTT -- have flaws. They must be administered when a person has fasted for at least eight hours, which is often a deterrent. And their results may not be entirely accurate, improving with short-term lifestyle changes such as when a person eats healthier and exercises in the days prior to the test.
An HbA1c test, by contrast, can be administered at any time and offers a long-term view of an individual's glucose control. With these and other factors in mind, the panel recommended using an HbA1c cutoff of 6.5% as a screening test for diabetes and suggested follow-up tests to confirm the diagnosis of diabetes. These recommendations await consideration by major medical associations, but one day they may allow many people to become diagnosed sooner. Reported in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism (Volume 93, page 2447).
Posted in Diabetes on July 30, 2009
Medical Disclaimer: This information is not intended to substitute for the advice of a physician. Click here for additional information: Johns Hopkins Health Alerts Disclaimer
Notify Me
Would you like us to inform you when we post new Diabetes Health Alerts?
Comments
Health Alerts registered users may post comments and share experiences here at their own discretion. We regret that questions on individual health concerns to the Johns Hopkins editors cannot be answered in this space.
The views expressed here do not constitute medical advice, and do not represent the position of Johns Hopkins Medicine or Remedy Health Media, LLC, which has no responsibility for any comments posted on this site.
Post a Comment
Already a subscriber?
Login
New to Johns Hopkins Health Alerts?
Hello,
I think that in addition to the three tests recommended to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes and conducted with those tests should be an insulin test. I am certain, if prediabetes individuals were tested for the level of insulin, most probably at an increased amount to counter the "sugar" in the bloodstream, it would reveal that the pancreas is working "ober-time" to remove "sugar" and this stress will lead to the failure of that organ to control blood "sugar".
I know from personal experience. I was diagnosed with " " peripheral neuropathy and the three afformentioned tests were done but showed normal blood "sugar" level and HbA1c. I was NOT tested for insulin level. My status continued for years with normal tests results until one day, my blood "sugar" was 1 point above normal. NOW, I was a DIABETIC! I asked that my insulin level be checked along with the three aformentioned tests and , surprize!, my insulin level was very high.
I think if insulin levels are tested with the three tests, an earlier and more complete diagnosis would be possible. I think the reason that there are "millions" of "pre-diabetics" is because insulin levels are not tested. It seems common sense that the organ responsible for controlling "sugar" by insulin is not tested to see how it is performing: more that normal insulin levels with blood "sugar" within the norm, is progressing down the road to diabetes. Thank you for reading my comment.
Posted by: joedoksjr | July 30, 2009 12:04 PM